\chapter{匹配问题} \section{二部图与匹配} \begin{wrapfigure}[11]{r}{5cm} \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture} \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a1) at (0,0) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a2) at (0,1) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a3) at (0,2) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a4) at (0,3) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a5) at (0,4) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a6) at (0,5) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b1) at (4,0) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b2) at (4,1) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b3) at (4,2) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b4) at (4,3) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b5) at (4,4) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b6) at (4,5) {}; \draw (a1)--(b3); \draw[blue!30] (a1)--(b4); \draw[blue!30] (a1)--(b5); \draw (a2)--(b1); \draw[blue!30] (a2)--(b3); \draw[blue!30] (a2)--(b5); \draw[blue!30] (a3)--(b1); \draw (a3)--(b2); \draw[blue!30] (a3)--(b4); \draw[blue!30] (a4)--(b2); \draw[blue!30] (a4)--(b3); \draw (a4)--(b6); \draw[blue!30] (a5)--(b1); \draw (a5)--(b5); \draw[blue!30] (a5)--(b6); \draw[blue!30] (a6)--(b2); \draw (a6)--(b4); \end{tikzpicture} \end{center} \caption{一个二部图与它的一个完美匹配} \end{wrapfigure} 我们先来看几个定义: \begin{definition}[二部图] 称一张图为二部图,若它可以划分为两个部分$A, B$,使得图中的每一条边都连接两部分中的某一对顶点。 \end{definition} \begin{definition}[匹配] 若一个边的集合中的任意两个边无公共顶点,则这个集合称为一个\newnoun{匹配}{matching}。一个覆盖了所有点的匹配称为\newnoun{完美匹配}{perfect matching}。 \end{definition} \begin{theorem}[König's Theorem] 一切度不为零的正则二部图一定有完美匹配。 \end{theorem} \begin{definition} 对图$G = (V,E), v \in V$,记$v$的临域为$N_G(v)$。对点集$S \subset V$,定义$S$的临域为$N_G(S) := \bigcup_{v \in S}N_G(v)$。 \end{definition} \section{主定理} \begin{theorem}[The Marriage Theorem婚姻定理] 二部图含有完美匹配当且仅当$\vert A \vert = \vert B \vert$且对$A$的任意子集$S \subset A, \vert S \vert \leq \vert N(S)\vert$。 \end{theorem} \begin{remark} 如果将定理中的$A,B$互换,定理应该仍旧成立,特别是其中的不等式对$B$也成立。因此两个不等式其一应该可以推倒出另一个。 \end{remark} \begin{proposition} 对一个二部图若$\forall S \subset A$有$\vert S \vert \leq \vert N(S) \vert$,则$\forall T \subset B$有$\vert T \vert \leq \vert N(T) \vert$。 \end{proposition} \begin{figure}[!htpb] \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.85] \draw (-2,0) ellipse (1 and 3); \draw (2,0) ellipse (1 and 3); \draw (-2,1.5) ellipse (0.7 and 1); \draw (2,1.5) circle (0.7); \draw (-2,2.5)--(2,2.2); \draw (-2,0.5)--(2,0.8); \node (A) at (-3.5, 0) {$A$}; \node (B) at (3.5, 0) {$B$}; \node at (-2,1.5) {$N(T)$}; \node at (2,1.5) {$T$}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{center} \caption{$T$与它的临域$N(T)$} \label{婚姻定理引理} \end{figure} \begin{proof} 对于$T \subset B$(如图\ref{婚姻定理引理}),有 \[N(A \setminus N(T)) \subset B \setminus T\] 那么 \begin{align*} \vert A \vert - \vert N(T) \vert & = \vert A \setminus N(T) \vert\\ & \leq \vert N(A\setminus N(T)) \vert\\ & \leq \vert B \setminus T\vert\\ & = \vert B \vert - \vert T \vert \end{align*} 综合起来即 \[\vert A \vert - \vert N(T) \vert \leq \vert B \vert - \vert T \vert\] 得到$\vert N(T) \vert \geq \vert T\vert$。 \end{proof} \begin{wrapfigure}{r}{6cm} \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.7] \draw (-2,0) ellipse (1 and 3); \draw (2,0) ellipse (1 and 3); \draw (-2,0) circle (0.7); \draw (2,0) circle (0.7); \draw (-2,0.7)--(2,0.7); \draw (-2,-0.7)--(2,-0.7); \draw (-2,2)--(2,2); \node[draw=black, fill=black, circle] at (-2,2) {}; \node[draw=black, fill=black, circle] at (2,2) {}; \node (A) at (-3.5, 0) {$A$}; \node (B) at (3.5, 0) {$B$}; \node at (-2,0) {$S$}; \node at (2,0) {$R$}; \node[above] at (-2,2.2) {$a$}; \node[above] at (2,2.2) {$b$}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{center} \caption{图$G$} \label{婚姻定理证明} \end{wrapfigure} 下面我们来证明婚姻定理: \begin{proof} 必要性是显然的。现在来证明充分性: 对图的顶点数使用数学归纳法。$\vert A \vert = \vert B \vert = 1$时,结论显然成立。 设$\vert A \vert = \vert B \vert \leq k$时,结论成立。当$\vert A \vert = \vert B \vert = k + 1$时,在$A$中找一点$a$,那么 \[\vert N(a) \vert \geq \vert \{a\} \vert = 1\] 这意味着一定存在$b \in B$且$b \in N(a)$,即$a$与$b$可配对。 现在,令$H := G - a - b$,即将$G$中的$a, b$及所有某个端点为$a$或$b$的边都删除后得到的图。 \begin{enumerate}[label=(\arabic{*})] \item 若$\forall S \subseteq A \setminus \{a\}$与$R = N_H(S)$,有 \[\vert S \vert \leq \vert R \vert\] 那么由归纳假设,$H$有完美匹配,再加上$a,b$的配对,可以得到$G$有完美匹配,得证; \item 若$\exists S \subset A \setminus \{a\}$满足$\vert S \vert > \vert R \vert$,注意到$\vert S \vert < \vert N_G(S)$而$\vert S \vert \leq \vert N_H(S) \vert$,这意味着$b \in N_G(S)$。可设$T = R \cup \{b\}$。那么我们有$T = N_G(S)$且$\vert S \vert = \vert T \vert$。 设两个子图:$G_1 := G(S \cup T), G_2 := G[(A \setminus S) \cup (B \setminus T)]$,即对$G_1 = (V_1, E_1)$,其中$V_1 \subset S \cup T$且$E_1 = \{e \in E \mid e \cap S \neq \varnothing, e \cap T \neq \varnothing\}$。$G_2$也类似定义。 注意到$G_1$是二部图而且$\vert S \vert = \vert T \vert$,而且在$G$中$S$的临域就是$T$,这意味着$\forall X \subset S$,$N_G(X) = N_{G_1}(X) \subseteq T$。那么我们由题目条件知道$ \vert X \vert \leq \vert N_G(X) \vert = \vert N_{G_1}(X)\vert$由归纳假设,$G_1$中有完美匹配;类似地,$G_2$也有完美匹配。 再加上$a,b$也是匹配的,因此将$ab, G_1, G_2$组合起来就得到了$G$的完美匹配。 \end{enumerate} 综上,$G$有完美匹配,$\vert A \vert = \vert B \vert = k + 1$时结论也成立。 \end{proof} 通过类似的证明方法,我们还能得到一个婚姻定理的推广: \begin{theorem}\label{婚姻定理推广} 在若一个二部图满足对$A$的任意子集$X \subset A$都有$\vert X \vert \leq \vert N(X) \vert$($A$与$B$的元素数不一定相等),那么一定存在一个匹配包括$A$中所有的点(但$B$中可能有点没有与$A$中的点匹配)。 \end{theorem} \section{如何找到完美匹配} \begin{figure}[H] \centering \subfloat[贪心算法]{ \begin{tikzpicture} \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a1) at (0,0) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a2) at (0,1) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a3) at (0,2) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a4) at (0,3) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a5) at (0,4) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a6) at (0,5) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b1) at (4,0) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b2) at (4,1) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b3) at (4,2) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b4) at (4,3) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b5) at (4,4) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b6) at (4,5) {}; \draw (a1)--(b3); \draw[blue!30] (a1)--(b4); \draw[blue!30] (a1)--(b5); \draw (a2)--(b1); \draw[blue!30] (a2)--(b3); \draw[blue!30] (a2)--(b5); \draw[blue!30] (a3)--(b1); \draw[blue!30] (a3)--(b2); \draw (a3)--(b4); \draw (a4)--(b2); \draw[blue!30] (a4)--(b3); \draw[blue!30] (a4)--(b6); \draw[blue!30] (a5)--(b1); \draw (a5)--(b5); \draw[blue!30] (a5)--(b6); \draw[blue!30] (a6)--(b2); \draw[blue!30] (a6)--(b4); \end{tikzpicture} } \hspace{2cm} \subfloat[寻找可扩路]{ \begin{tikzpicture} \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a1) at (0,0) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a2) at (0,1) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a3) at (0,2) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a4) at (0,3) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a5) at (0,4) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a6) at (0,5) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b1) at (4,0) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b2) at (4,1) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b3) at (4,2) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b4) at (4,3) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b5) at (4,4) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b6) at (4,5) {}; \draw (a1)--(b3); \draw[blue!30] (a1)--(b4); \draw[blue!30] (a1)--(b5); \draw (a2)--(b1); \draw[blue!30] (a2)--(b3); \draw[blue!30] (a2)--(b5); \draw[blue!30] (a3)--(b1); \draw[red] (a3)--(b2); \draw (a3)--(b4); \draw[blue, line width=2pt, dashed] (a3)--(b4); \draw (a4)--(b2); \draw[blue, line width=2pt, dashed] (a4)--(b2); \draw[blue!30] (a4)--(b3); \draw[red] (a4)--(b6); \draw[blue!30] (a5)--(b1); \draw (a5)--(b5); \draw[blue!30] (a5)--(b6); \draw[blue!30] (a6)--(b2); \draw[red] (a6)--(b4); \node at (-0.5, 5) {$u$}; \node at (4.5, 5) {$v$}; \node at (-1, 2.5) {$A$}; \node at (5, 2.5) {$B$}; \end{tikzpicture} } \end{figure} \subsection{思路} \begin{enumerate} \item 首先贪心地尽可能多地配对,直到$A$中剩下的点都不能配对(在本土中只有$u$一个)为止。这时对应的$B$中应该也有同样多的不能配对的点。 \item 在图中寻找一条从$u$开始的、未选的(红色)和已选的(黑色,蓝虚线)交替连接的、$v$为终点的路(path),称为一条\newnoun{可扩路}{augmenting path}。 \item 把这条路上红色的变为选中的路,蓝色的变为没有选中的路,匹配的点又多了一对。 \end{enumerate} \subsection{方法正确性的证明} \begin{figure}[H] \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.85] \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a1) at (0,0) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a2) at (0,1) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (a3) at (0,2) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black, fill=black] (a4) at (0,3) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black, fill=black] (a5) at (0,4) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black, fill=black] (a6) at (0,5) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black, fill=black] (a7) at (0,6) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = blue, fill=blue!30] (a8) at (0,7) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = blue, fill=blue!30] (a9) at (0,8) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b1) at (3,0) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b2) at (3,1) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black] (b3) at (3,2) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black, fill=black] (b4) at (3,3) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black, fill=black] (b5) at (3,4) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black, fill=black] (b6) at (3,5) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = black, fill=black] (b7) at (3,6) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = blue, fill=blue!30] (b8) at (3,7) {}; \draw node[circle, draw = blue, fill=blue!30] (b9) at (3,8) {}; \draw (a1)--(b1); \draw (a2)--(b2); \draw (a3)--(b3); \draw (a4)--(b4); \draw (a5)--(b5); \draw (a6)--(b6); \draw (a7)--(b7); \draw[red] (a8)--(b6); \draw[red] (a6)--(b5); \draw[green] (a5)--(b9); \draw[blue] (a5)--(b3); \draw[rounded corners] (-1,6.5) rectangle (0.5,8.5); \draw[rounded corners] (2.5,6.6) rectangle (4,8.5); \draw[rounded corners] (-1.2,2.5) rectangle (0.7,8.7); \draw[rounded corners] (2.5,2.5) rectangle (4,6.4); \node at (-0.6, 7.5) {$U$}; \node at (3.6, 7.5) {$W$}; \node at (-0.6, 4.5) {$S$}; \node at (3.6, 4.5) {$T$}; \node at (-0.5,4) {$s$}; \node at (-0.5,7) {$u$}; \node at (-0.5,2) {$q$}; \node at (3.5,8) {$r$}; \node at(3.5,2) {$r$}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{center} \caption{寻找可扩路的过程中可能遇到的几种情况} \end{figure} 设在贪心配对之后,$U$为未配对的$A$中的点的集合,$W$为未配对的$B$中的点的集合。 若一条路是以$U$中的某个点为起点、被选中的和没被选中的边交替、终点在$A$中的路,则称它是一条\newnoun{几乎可扩路}{almost augmenting path}。 先令$S = U$。之后每次新找到一个可以由几乎可扩路达到的$A$中的点,都把这个点加入$S$中。设$T$是$B$中与$S$中的点配对的点。那么时刻有$\vert S \vert = \vert T \vert + \vert U \vert$。 设$M$是已经配对的点和将它们配对的边组成的集合。我们不断重复下面的操作:如果我们能在$S$中找到$s \in S$,满足$\exists r \in B \setminus T, sr \in E \setminus M$,即有一个从$S$中连接至$T$之外的点的边,就考虑:设$Q$是从$u \in U$开始,$s$结束的几乎可扩路(图中红色)。我们找到的$sr$有两种可能的情况: \begin{enumerate} \item $r$是未配对的($r \in W$,图中的绿色线),那么$Q-sr$组成了一个可扩路,将红色部分加入、黑色部分删去,就增加了一对配对的点,即我们成功地将$s, r$扩充进了$M$; \item $r$是已经配对的(图中的蓝色线),那么我们可以设它与$q$配对,那么$Q-sr-rq$形成了一个新的几乎可扩路,这意味着$q$可以被添加进$S$,$r$应该被添加到$T$中。 \end{enumerate} 不论我们执行了哪个动作,我们要么扩充了$M$,要么扩充了$S$。等我们检查了$S$中所有的点之后,我们要么得到$M$是一个完美匹配,要么是$M$不是完美匹配,而所有$U$内点出发的所有可扩路都结束在$S$内,且$S$内所有点都不与$T$之外的点相连,这意味着$T = N(S)$,然而$\vert T \vert = \vert S \vert - \vert U \vert < \vert S \vert$。我们找到了$A$的一个子集$S$满足$\vert S \vert > \vert N(S)\vert$。根据婚姻定理,这个二部图不存在完美匹配。